The following study is based on a combination of measured comparative response rates for the two types of membership survey and the anecdotal experiences of our NFP and University Faculty customer base. On the face of it the two membership data collection methods appear similar in their cost to the organisation. However, when all factors are closely examined an entirely different picture emerges.
A paper based survey is usually designed/ written, printed / photocopied and mailed to all potential respondees requesting participation. Return or completion rates for paper-based surveys range between 6 and 12% so we have used a theoretical mean of 10% in this study. Online survey returns are, on average between 100% and 150% higher than those for paper based surveys so we have used a (conservative) theoretical return rate of 20% in the online survey study
Once the surveys are returned the results have to be loaded into some form of data reporting tool and then you have to devise your own methodology to filter the results.
|
B. Qsmart Online Survey Costs (based on 1000 people being given the opportunity to participate via outbound email and survey link)
Qsmart's pricing mechanism is based on buying a ‘responses quota'. This starts at a ‘100' response level and has breaks at ‘500', ‘1000', ‘5000' and ‘10,000'. The higher the volume you are prepared to buy-down the more cost effective the rate gets. For example the 100 and below level = $1.00 per response, at a 100>500 level this drops to an average of $0.80 cents.
A typical cost to set up a survey would be as follows. (This is based on outsourcing the survey build function as well. The cost would be $500 less if you built the online survey in house)
Note: the online survey return or completion rate of 20% of the invited membership is a theoretical mean based on average return levels by our clients. Higher return levels are regularly achieved, particularly when response incentives are introduced.
|
|
As can be seen, the amount of executive and personnel time spent launching and analysing an online survey is considerably less than a paper survey. As well, our customers tell us that the removal of mundane, repetitive data input / collation tasks from the office environment has a positive effect on staff morale. Additionally, in an age where environmental impact has become critical to any organisation, being seen to be doing the right thing through the reduction of consumables is a highly positive factor.